God save Nguyen. The Queen won't do it

Sydney Morning Herald
November 16, 2005

The Queen's feeble response to a plea from Nguyen's mother, Kim, to intervene in support of her son's bid for clemency raises serious constitutional issues, writes George Newhouse.

Commentators and legal advocates continue to protest against the death penalty in the case of Nguyen Tuong Van, an Australian citizen due to be hanged in Singapore.

Nguyen is to be put to death for a drug offence for which he would be jailed for perhaps six years in Australia, and his case has sparked a legitimate debate about whether he deserves to die for his crime.

But the Queen's feeble response to a plea from Nguyen's mother, Kim, to intervene in support of her son's bid for clemency raises serious constitutional issues; it highlights the conflicts of interest that underlie our hybrid monarchy and the limits on the Queen's ability to promote Australian interests, particularly where they vary from Britain's position.

When Kim Nguyen recently made her plea to London, a Buckingham Palace spokesperson said the Queen would not act without the approval of the British Government.

Is nobody else gobsmacked by that response? While the nation has been focused on humanitarian concerns, the Queen's announcement has slipped by without comment.

I had laboured under the misapprehension that the Queen was our monarch - the Queen of Australia. I believed, like most Australians, that our Queen took advice on Australian interests from our prime minister and not from the British Parliament.

Surely if an Australian's life is at stake, we can expect that the Queen will seek the advice from the Australian prime minister and not Tony Blair. But when the interests of Australia conflict with those of the UK, it is the United Kingdom that must, understandably, prevail. Remember they do pay her salary through the British civil list.

So what happens when Australian interests conflict with British interests? The official protocol is that the British will prevail.

It surprises me that republicans did not jump on the Queen's embarrassing announcement. It is clear that the political and economic interests of Australia and Britain will differ from time to time and it is inappropriate for our head of state to be conflicted in such cases.

It is time Australians had a head of state that does not owe primary allegiance to a foreign parliament.

George Newhouse is a member of the legal teams acting for Vivian Alvarez Solon and Cornelia Rau.

 

Media articles are posted for the purpose of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under "fair use" provisions and may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owners, except for "fair use."