A constitution establishes rules of engagement between women and men.
constitution crumbles with corruption
The Australian Constitution, under constant review since the 1970s as women moved
collectively into politics, is crumbling under the weight of corruption following the 2004
re-election of a Coalition government led by a pathological liar, revealed extensively on the
site johnhowardlies.com during the campaign.
Redfern graffiti 2004
Cardinal Pell omits rational democracy in the article "Towards a transformative democracy founded
on the dignity of us all". (Herald November 12)
democracy and the age of reason
Modern democracy emerged with the age of reason, dawning centuries ago for men, and as men reasoned it was rational to relinquish outright control
of communities, over the past century for women.
Australia's bogus election result
Try again Australia, nobody's duped; democracy achieves rational representation.
Is the management of your
Corporations manage behaviour. Women and men possess different reason, perception and behaviour.
Common and Statute laws contain no provision for women's courts and men's
courts yet modern science is universally of the view that women and men are
different because their brains are different which results in different
perceptions, priorities and behaviour.
On three occasions over four years employment with the Australian Public
Service [APS] I gave advice to Prime Minister John Howard about a provision
of a workplace agreement concerning activities erroneously entitled Shared
Behaviours from the perspective of modern science that women and men have
Government governs behaviour. Women and men have different reason, perception and behaviour.
are you stupid?
You know that women and men think differently so why aren't there women's courts and men's courts?
why there is
Nations govern behaviour. Women and men have different perception,
reason and behaviour.
copyright brigitte unicorn and
philip mckeon 2004